Soft Paws: Nutrition for dogs

0
Share

By Charlene Marchand

For Capital Region Independent Media

Pictured with CGHS/SPCA Animal Care Technician Amy Riedel is Kai, a 1-year-old American Staffordshire terrier mix who was found as a stray and never reclaimed. Not only is he extremely affectionate with people, but he loves other animals. Kai is at his happiest when he’s playing in the yard with his favorite human! Contributed photo

A few years ago, a number of my colleagues attended a canine nutritional conference sponsored by the Ladies Kennel Club of Long Island. Well-known AKC Judge Charlotte McGowan also wrote a synopsis of this lecture, available for all to read.

The speaker was Dr. Rebecca Remillard, D.V.M., Ph.D., an ACVN Diplomat. Dr. Remillard is a Tufts graduate with a degree in animal nutrition, and at that time she was a veterinary nutritionist at Angell Animal Medical Center in Boston. She is not associated with any dog food company. Reviews of her detailed, technical, and in-depth presentation were rave.

Let’s consolidate the high points:

Very important to note is that only a few large dog food producing companies participate in test feeding before marketing their product. Look for the AAFCO statement on the label that states the food is complete and balanced. There are only two ways to discern this. Method one involves a trial feeding test of a minimum of six months. Method two involves laboratory analysis of nutrients.

According to Dr. Remillard, the feeding test is to be preferred and is the most reliable. The companies that test-feed their dog foods include Iams, Purina, Hills, and Royal Canin. Waltham (who produces Nutro), Pedigree and Royal Canin bought out smaller companies – now improving the financial means and resources to do these tests.

Veterinary specialty products, most often produced by Purina and Hills, target very specific nutritional needs of dogs based on illness diagnosis and veterinary recommendation.

When asked if owners should be reviewing and comparing the ingredients on dog food bags, i.e. doing an ingredients’ count, Dr. Remillard’s answer was an unequivocal “no.” She stated that we cannot ascertain ingredient quality by the “list.”

Her discussion returned at this point to the value of feeding trials. Dogs and their condition don’t lie. Apparently, research on dog foods has been set back by the involvement of PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). Bad publicity was generated by PETA involving a company doing test feeding. Apparently, many smaller companies are now reluctant to conduct feeding trials for fear of reprisal. Shame on them – PETA, I mean.

When questioned about raw feeding, the nutritionist stated that most products are not nutritionally balanced, and that some zoonotic diseases can be associated with raw products.

Last but not least, Dr. Remillard said that a reference to “human grade” is meaningless, misleading and incorrect. It was explained to the audience that product ingredients cannot be “graded.” An unsuspecting consumer may be led to believe that a dog food is superior because of its human-grade advertising. Another “buyer beware.”

The manner in which a food is shipped, being subjected to extreme heat or freezing, also affects food quality. Large companies have more resources for shipping control.

I am often asked for recommendations when clients express problems with their dogs’ diets, appetites, conditions, eliminations, etc. Many of these dogs, being fed expensive “top of the list” and “top of the line” products, seem to self-destruct. We then have alternative feeding discussions (and product choices), ultimately to be rubber-stamped by their veterinarian.

We should NOT rotate and change formulas randomly. Don’t fix what’s not broken. If a crack does exist, seek the advice of seasoned dog managers, and your veterinary professional

My mantra: keep it simple, but buy properly. Reward companies with history, nutritionists on staff, and feeding trials. If a food is not working, consult with your veterinarian before going on a dog food cruise. Otherwise, the results could be “sea-sickness!”

Charlene Marchand is the chairperson of the Columbia-Greene Humane Society/SPCA Board of Directors. She may be contacted at cghsaaron@gmail.com.

Related Posts